- PCR and Lateral Flow Tests are inaccurate, unreliable, frequently produce false positive results and fail to distinguish between COVID and colds or the flu. (25 sources including Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning inventor of the PCR process.)
- While the level of severity can be different, there are no symptoms or collections of symptoms unique or specific to "COVID” and only “COVID” that don’t apply to other ailments. (12 sources, including the US Centre for Disease Control and the British National Health Services). Could this explain why almost all flu diagnoses (typically 9.3 million annually in the US) disappeared during the pandemic?
- Both COVID cases and related deaths were statistically manipulated and artificially inflated. (13 sources including health officials in Denmark, Italy, Germany, the UK and Northern Ireland).
- There is little to no evidence that lockdowns had any impact on COVID deaths. (20 sources including the World Health Organization)
- The vaccines do not confer immunity or prevent transmission, can have serious side effects, and have unknown long term adverse health effects. (13 sources)
- Ventilators did not work and increased the possibility of death for many. (8 sources)
- Masks do not cause a reduction in the spread of the disease and can be bad for your health (38 sources)
- The global death toll of “COVID”, even with exaggerated statistics, was never high enough to justify the draconian responses we saw from most world governments. (20 sources)
- Planning for a pandemic and vaccine passports began a year before the outbreak of COVID. (18 sources)
- The COVID pandemic advanced a preexisting political agenda under which corporations and rich elites got a lot richer. Wealth and power was redistributed upwards. (25 sources)
One could argue that Points 9 and 10 have the ring of conspiracy theory. Maybe. Maybe not. Coincidences do happen. However, there is something else that set up alarm bells for many people.
Blocking Treatment Options other than the MRNA Vaccine
In many countries people who were diagnosed with COVID were denied early treatment options, regardless of whether they had been vaccinated or not. The most egregious example is that of Ivermectin, a safe, widely used, and cheap medication that has been around for 50 years and won its inventor the Nobel Prize. According to a recently published meta analysis, 62 studies from 56 independent teams in 26 different countries actually showed statistically significant improvement of COVID symptoms after taking Ivermectin. As for those that did not, a just published article in the Epoch Times argues that many Ivermectin trials may have been deliberately designed to fail.
Over twenty countries adopted Ivermectin for COVID treatment even though they were administering vaccines. Canada did not. The medical strategy here was quite the reverse. Doctors in Ontario, Saskatchewan, Manitoba , Alberta and BC who dared to prescribe Ivermectin faced charges of unprofessional conduct. Emergency room doctors who dared to prescribe it lost their jobs.
Did this denial of additional treatment negatively affect COVID patients? Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized biochemist (virology, immunology, molecular biology) and one of the original inventors of the MRNA technology behind the vaccine, believes so. His sobering assessment, made on a Joe Rogan podcast, is that as many as 500,000 Americans might have died unnecessarily because they were not allowed access to drugs like Ivermectin. If his estimate is realistic that implies the possibility of tens of thousands of unnecessary deaths in Canada.
The Shaming of Those who Oppose Government Policy
Dr. Malone, ultimately turned against the COVID vaccines, claiming they had not undergone significant testing. For that, he has been accused of disseminating misinformation and falsehoods (The Washington Post, The New York Times, Wikipedia, the Atlantic, etc. ). This is not unusual. Doctors and academics, including those with world reputations, who expressed doubts and concerns about the official story have all too often found themselves the target of character assassination and even stripped of their qualifications. Attacks have come from medical authorities, academic institutions, mainstream media and from social media fact checkers who may have a vested interest in a particular position. Deplatforming has become commonplace.
All things considered, it’s been a very hard four years for those individuals in the medical and academic world who dared to take a position contrary to what Dr. Fauci and the US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) were saying. The question still to be answered is whether they were right to take such risks to their career. What does the emerging evidence say?
Information You Rarely See in the Mainstream Media
A Google search will not easily find you evidence contesting the official story on the benefits of the vaccine as expressed by Dr. Fauci and company. But it’s there, much of it buried in government statistics. Here’s a glimpse of what’s emerging.
- Mortality rates are up and rising. An analysis of government statistics, both in Japan and the UK, suggests they may be higher among the vaccinated.
- There has been a surge in heart problems, particularly among males aged 12-24. A US government funded report published last week reported a causal link between myocarditis and two of the vaccines
- New cancer cases are on the rise, particularly among young adults and children .
- Infertility, miscarriages and still births have risen post COVID.
There have, of course, been many minor effects documented. A recently published paper reported an increase in sinus problems found in those taking booster shots. That shouldn’t be a surprise. The official document Pfizer was forced to release in 2022 revealed 1291 different adverse events noted in their clinical trials.
To be clear, concerned scientists are not insisting that the rise in health problems we continue to see are all caused by the vaccine. What they are asserting is that research has to be done to see if there is a connection. Moreover, during that interim period of investigation MRNA vaccination programs should be halted.
Already there have been some disturbing findings with respect to how the MRNA vaccine works inside the body.
- It’s now known that the Spike Protein, an integral part of the MRNA vaccine, travels throughout the body and can be disruptive to multiple organs.
- Numerous DNA fragments have been found in some (but not all) MRNA vaccines. They are not supposed to be there.
- Embalmers around the world are finding huge white snakelike clots in the circulation system of the deceased.
Finally, there are also questions arising over how many of the estimated 6.9% of American adults who had the continuing symptoms of Long COVID may actually have had Long Vax symptoms – meaning their symptoms were caused by the vaccine(s) they took.
The Way Forward?
If any of the above observations provokes you to dig deeper through the COVID story, be aware that most Google sites (if you can find them) publishing articles questioning the official COVID narrative tend to have been fact checked as being misleading or inaccurate. That includes sources for this blog posting, notably The Expose, the Brownstone Institute, the OffGuardian and Mercola.com.
Most people sailed through the vaccination process with no adverse health effects. That’s good. But it doesn’t change what the statistics and the research are starting to show. Far more people have suffered side effects with the MRNA shots compared with other vaccines. Moreover some of the side effects have been long lasting or deadly and we still don’t fully know what the long term consequences of MRNA technology might be.
We responded to the COVID pandemic quite understandably with our hearts and our emotions. Now, before the next health crisis hits us, perhaps it’s time to reassess with our heads.
Marilyn Reid